Friday, September 29, 2006

National Intelligence Estimate

The Nation Intelligence Estimate this week said that the war in Iraq has made the US less safe as it is creating more terrorist and terrorism. Pres. Bush, at a press conference today (Sept. 29) said, "You don't create more terrorists by bombing terrorists." I agree. You don't create more terrorists by bombing and destroying terrorists. What creates terrorist, Mr. President, is invading a country with limited military capability that is not nor ever was a threat to the United States. Mr. Bush continues to believe the myths he has created around 9/11 and Iraq. There is no credible evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destructions. There is no credible evidence that Iraq and alqada were working together to threaten the United States. There is no credible evidence that Iraq was trying to get uranium from Africa. Yet the president continues to feed the American public, at least the 25% of the American public that are the right wing base, the same line. That line being: Iraq is the front line in the war on terrorism. There were no or very few known terrorists in Iraq when Bush invaded. At the time of the invasion, Afghanistan was the front line in the war on terrorism. Afghanistan should still be the front line. Instead, because of the Bush Doctrine, Iraq is now the front line. Only because Bush invaded. The terrorists came to Iraq in response to Bush's overreaction to 9/11. The invasion of Iraq was, by and far, the most egregious overreaction to 9/11. The terrorists and insurgents are in Iraq because Bush invaded. The terrorists came after the invasion not before. Bombing terrorists doesn't create terrorists but invading and bombing a sovereign country does. The war in Iraq created the terrorists and insurgents now in Iraq. The terrorists and insurgents didn't create the war in Iraq. They came as a response to Bush's war.

Friday, September 22, 2006

A Naval Aviator’s Message to Terrorists

I was recently forwarded an article supposedly written by a naval aviator entitled, “I Am Coming.” More than likely, however, the author was some right-winger attempting to drum up feelings of patriotism and support for the war effort in Iraq that has been badly mismanaged and executed and one that the majority of the American public rightly no longer supports. This so-called “aviator” in his article addresses the terrorists, which are his intended victims. He says he wants them to get to know him as an average, law-abiding, church-going American, who respects his elders, his country etc. He says that as a naval aviator he can give back to his country, which has given so much to him. He goes on to say that he will not hide behind women and children as the terrorists do when he comes after them. He closes with the chilling words, “I wish we could meet up close in a small room where I could wrap my hands around your throat and slowly squeeze the life out of you---“ and “I can put a 2000 lb. weapon through a window from 10,000 feet up.”
This piece deserves a response for several reasons. For one it more than likely represents the feelings of many Americans. As I read his message, I at first found myself cheering on this “aviator.” I could feel his anger, the white-hot passion for revenge, which resonated with my own feelings. After all, the terrorists represent the very incarnation of evil itself. But there is also a jarring disconnect at the end of his message which ironically belies his attempts to paint himself as a good and decent American whose values contradict the barbarous actions of the terrorists. By expressing his desire to “wrap my hands around your throat and slowly squeeze the life out of you” he is lowering himself to their level. He is naively playing into the hands of the terrorists. That is exactly the kind of reaction from the Americans they want to see. They don’t want to see an America that espouses decency justice and fair play. They want to see an America that lowers its military tactics down to their cruel and inhumane level. That makes excellent propaganda for them. They have already seen American military barbarism at Abu Grahib and Mahmoudiya. The “aviator’s” harsh threat would be music to their ears.
Another disturbing and frightening thought that the writer’s message generates is that the aviator’s vengeful words represent the naïve attitudes of many right-wing Americans who simply have learned nothing from history. They still hold on to the simplistic idea that America’s superior military might will defeat the terrorists. How short their memories are and how quickly they have forgotten the lessons of Vietnam! Despite our vastly superior military might, we were brought to our knees largely by a technologically inferior but determined rag-tag Viet Cong guerilla force and in the process thousands of Americans died in vain. History is replete with examples of vastly superior armies being defeated by determined guerilla insurgencies---especially if these armies are foreign occupiers who initiated pre-emptive military intrusions, as was the case with this country in Vietnam and now in Iraq.
The writer closes his address to the terrorists with “God Bless the U.S.A,” on the surface a seemingly admirable show of patriotism. The problem with that is this statement has come to have a negative connotation for many Americans and much of the rest of the civilized world for several reasons. Especially since 9/11 right-wingers have used this expression sanctimoniously, unconsciously perhaps, but implying nevertheless that the Bush Administration’s execution of the Iraqi War is being conducted correctly and competently and that Bush’s actions are sanctioned by a higher power. That’s why many Americans are now repulsed by such statements as “God Bless America.” But there is another reason. To many it sounds as though we want a supreme being to consider us a special, privileged country that deserves a place above all other nations. Why bless only the U.S.A? Why not implore the deity to bless all those nations and cultures that show justice, compassion, and understanding?
By coincidence shortly after I received this article, I was privileged to hear Arum Gandhi, the grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, speak on “Lessons That I Learned from My Grandfather.” The core of his message echoed that of his grandfather--- the employment of nonviolent tactics in confrontational situations. He pointed out that much of the world sees the U.S. as a militaristic bully. One can infer from his lecture that military dominance does not carry the same weight and importance as it once did. We must learn to live in a global world that is now vastly different. Horizontal relationships between cultures and countries now supersede the vertical constructs of political and military dominance. The old U.S. model of might and power must give way. We must learn to serve as a different type of model to the rest of the world---a model that emphasizes constructive dialogue even with our enemies (something Bush refuses to do). We should be thought of as a country that values respect for other cultures and one that encourages understanding and cooperation among nations. We should not be thought of as nation that uses threats and trade restrictions to impose our will on those who disagree with us, as we have so often done in the past. In the end these actions are counter-productive and only diminish our standing in the world. The Bush Administration and the right wing conservatives have yet to learn these important lessons.
Of course, this does not mean that we stop pursuing the terrorists and bring them to justice. But indulging in such macho rhetoric as “wrap my hands around your throat and squeeze the life out of you” makes us appear little better than the terrorists. How we change our world image and yet defeat religious fundamentalist terrorism is a daunting task and will not be easy, but it is one that we must continuously strive to achieve.

Herb Panko
25 Mill House Lane S.W.
Chatfield, Mn. 55923
Hepchat55923@yahoo.com

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Prayer Meeting

Next week, it seems, a group is organizing a nationwide prayer from 7:15 am until about 8:00 am on school grounds. I have seen fliers in the school in Lanesboro and in Harmony. I am guessing fliers are also posted in Mabel, Chatfield, and Spring Valley. The flier has a quote from Psalms “Be still and know I am God.” I can’t fathom why the people who created this flier would quote the old testament. Does the person really want people to pray to the old testament god? Why in the world would people pray to a cruel, intolerant, vindictive, mean-spirited, and egotistical god? The god of the old testament is cruel (it killed all the first born sons of Egypt). It is intolerant (it wiped out Sodom and Gomorrah). It is vindictive (it had to teach the Egyptians a lesson for keeping the Hebrews as slaves). It is mean-spirited (who can forgot how it treated Job). It is egotistical (it had to prove it was god by punishing Egypt). It is genocidal (it destroyed all of creation except for Noah and his family). Why would anyone in their right mind pray to this god? At least the people who are organizing this could have given a quote from Jesus. Not the supernatural god-man Jesus but something from the historical Jesus. The organizers of this event need to more closely read the Bible and they will see how cruel the old testament god is.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Pope's Remarks

Last week the Pope for whatever unknown reason managed to inflame the Muslim world by quoting an obscure 14th century emperor of the Byzantine Empire. In his speech, delivered in Germany, the Pope quoted Emperor Manuel II Palaeologus. Palaeologus said “everything Mohammad brought was evil and inhuman such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” The Pope has said he meant no offense or harm with the comment. The Pope comments have led to widespread protests and demonstrations against the Pope in many Muslim countries. Just when the uproar over cartoons depicting Mohammad as a terrorist had subsided the Pope goes and throws gasoline on the simmering embers that remain. It is beyond me how the Pope, who must be a somewhat learned man and theologian, would wrongly believe his comments wouldn’t provoke any backlash. Either the Pope doesn’t read the speeches that are prepared for him before he delivers them or else he lacks any understanding of the Muslim world. It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to know that if you speak out about Islam and Mohammad it will cause a furor. Besides that, what business does the Pope have in criticizing another religion? A person of one faith is in no position to criticize another faith. Only people in that faith and culture have the right to criticize. There is plenty in Christianity for the Pope to criticize. Criticizing another religion borders on pandering to your base. If you speak out against a supposed evil religion, you can turn attention away from what people really want to discuss. You can draw attention away from scandal by distracting people by making another religion seem like a threat. The Pope is demonizing Islam. He is not interested in building bridges between faiths as his predecessor was. The Pope is a Yahwahist. He believes in the punishing, all-powerfully god of the old testament. His thinking is straight out of the 14th century. I guess that is why he would quote an obscure Byzantine emperor. The Pope in no way should be criticizing another religion. He fails to understand history and what happens when you criticize another’s religious views. Far too many times in the recent past have people criticized another’s religion with disastrous results. Sunnis criticize Shias and vice versa, Jewish criticize Muslims and vice versa, Hindus criticize Buddhist who criticize Muslims who criticize Christians and it goes on and on. I believe the problem isn’t about god but what people do in the name of their god. Christians believe that the only way to salvation is to accept that Jesus Christ is the savior and only through him can people get to heaven. Well, that leaves how many hundreds or millions of non-Christian in a lurch. How can they get to heaven if they don’t believe in Jesus Christ? Muslims have a different belief about how to get into heaven. If you don’t believe what Muslims believe how will you get to heaven? Each faith grew out of its own political, social, and religious reality hundreds to thousands of years ago. Each religion, when it was founded was created to meet the political, social, and religious needs of its audience. Mohammad needed to convince nomadic tribes living in a desert that his way was the right way. Early Christian needed to convince people living in the Roman world under Roman influence that Jesus was the way. The writings of each of these figures reflect those realities. All the books in the old testament are based on different political, social, and religious realities. Plus they are all myths created by nomads as they moved about a desert environment. The stories reflect the scientific understanding of that particular time. None of which is particularly relevant today. Science is the new religion. Belief should be based on what a person can see and experience not what an archaic text written anywhere from 8000 to 1600 years ago. I can accept that Jesus probably existed, was a charismatic teacher, and had some good things to say about how to treat people. What I have trouble accepting is the miracles he supposedly performed. Indications are that the gospels were based on stories that were circulating around the Mediterranean from Rome, Greece, Egypt, and Persia. The writers of the bible stories were smart and literate enough to copy and change the stories to make them fit their political, social, and religious realities. The same should be done today. The bible stories either, (a) need to be relegated to the dust bin of history, along with the god of the old testament and the god-man Jesus, or (b) reinterpreted to fit our current political, social, and scientific realities. If we reinterpret the stories to fit today’s reality, the stories become nothing more than myths like the stories of Zeus, Hades, Jupiter, Ossiris, etc. All of these gods have been discarded as human knowledge and scientific knowledge has expanded. Yahweh needs to be discarded, as does the god-man Jesus. If we strip away the miracles and religious underpinnings of the god-man Jesus, we are left with a humanitarian who preached love, tolerance, kindness, and compassion for others. And really isn’t that what we should all be doing, practicing love, kindness, compassion, and tolerance not sowing the seeds of hatred and distrust as the Pope has done.

Friday, September 08, 2006

Mr. Bush's War

Mr. Bush’s War in Iraq is no Comparison to the Fight Against Nazi Germany

Last week in Salt Lake City Mr. Bush compared the war in Iraq as being on the same level as the World War II fight against Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. He said victory in Iraq is as important a victory as at Omaha Beach and Guadalcanal. If I were a veteran of either of those campaigns I think I would be awfully upset at the comparison. What Mr. Bush fails to recognize is that Japan attacked us first and Hitler declared war on the United States before we actually went to war with either country. Iraq never attacked the United States. Iraq never declared war on the United States. World War II was a battle against two forces that were out for world domination. Hitler wanted to conquer and control Europe, Central Asia, and North Africa. Japan was out to conquer Asia and the Pacific. The two times Saddam Hussein tried to conquer new territory (Iran/Iraq war and Kuwait) he was defeated. Germany over ran much of Europe, into Central Asia, and North Africa. Japan over ran much of Asia Pacific and China. Japan and Germany were a direct threat to world peace and stability as can be seen by the 6 or more years of war it took to finally defeat these two powers. World War II was a struggle to liberate countries in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Pacific from three (Germany, Japan, and a lesser extent, Italy) countries intent on conquering the world. Before Mr. Bush violated US and international law by invading Iraq, Iraq had no plans for world domination, no plans to attack the United States, and was in no way a threat to the United States. His decision to go to war with Iraq was based on false and misleading information. Making a comparison to the noble struggle against Germany and Japan and the disaster of Mr. Bush’s making in Iraq is disrespectful, at the least, to the many veterans who fought and died on the beaches.